Server Vulnerability Monitoring
That Knows What's Actually Running
Coverage: Every Linux Host, Every Cloud
OS, cloud and on-prem — one scanner, one inventory.
Linux distributions
- · Debian, Ubuntu, RHEL, CentOS
- · Rocky, Alma, Oracle Linux
- · Amazon Linux 2 / 2023, SUSE, Fedora
Cloud VMs
- · AWS EC2 (snapshot + agent)
- · Azure VM, GCP GCE
- · Oracle Cloud Compute
On-prem & edge
- · Agent for air-gapped Linux
- · k3s / embedded Linux hosts
- · Branch VMs and bare metal
How It Scans: Agent or Agentless
Agentless reads cloud snapshots and inventory APIs — nothing installed on the host. Fastest way to onboard a 500-VM AWS account; a scan runs on a schedule and reports the full package and configuration state. Trade-off: it is point-in-time and cannot see runtime process behaviour.
Agent is a small Linux binary (userspace plus optional eBPF) deployed via your existing config management (Ansible, Chef, Puppet, cloud-init, k3s DaemonSet). It streams inventory changes continuously, works on on-prem and air-gapped hosts, and feeds the eBPF runtime signal so we know which CVEs are actually loaded in a running process.
Most teams start agentless on cloud VMs and layer the agent onto crown-jewel hosts and on-prem fleets. Both modes feed the same inventory, the same reports and the same remediation workflow.
Prioritize What's Actually Exploitable
A fresh scan on a mid-sized Linux fleet surfaces thousands of CVEs. Teams typically find 3–7% are both exploitable and reachable. That's the queue worth paging on.
CVSS severity
The theoretical severity score from NVD.
CISA KEV
Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list — attackers are using it right now.
EPSS probability
FIRST.org Exploit Prediction Scoring System — likelihood of exploitation in 30 days.
Exposure
Is the host internet-reachable, in a public subnet, or carrying public IPs?
Runtime use
Is the vulnerable library actually loaded by a running process (eBPF signal)?
Business impact
Tag the asset (prod, pci, cde, dev) and let policy weight it.
Patch Posture, CIS Hardening & Virtual Patching
Beyond CVEs, every host is scored against the CIS benchmark for its distribution — kernel settings, SSH configuration, auditd, filesystem permissions, service hardening. Drift triggers a finding mapped to the specific CIS control.
Patch posture shows the gap between what the host runs today and what the upstream package feed offers. You see mean time to patch, hosts missing kernel updates, and the specific CVEs that would be closed by the pending upgrade.
For critical CVEs with no patch available, eBPF virtual patching can block the exploitation pattern at the kernel boundary until the real fix ships. Every virtual patch has an expiry linked to the pending upstream fix — it is a time-buyer, not a replacement.
Reports for CERT-In VAPT, PCI-DSS 11.3 & SOC 2
Every scan produces audit-ready evidence. CERT-In VAPT-aligned vulnerability reports with discovery date, severity, remediation and closure date — the exact shape Indian regulators expect from empanelled auditors. PCI-DSS 11.3 internal and external scan reports with ASV-style formatting. SOC 2 CC7.1 vulnerability lifecycle evidence maps every finding to a control narrative.
Reports export as PDF or CSV, are retained for the audit window, and can be shared read-only with external auditors. See the full compliance mapping.
Part of the TigerGate Vulnerability Management Hub
Server vulnerability monitoring is one surface in the broader vulnerability management hub. The same console covers application dependencies (SCA/SBOM), container images, cloud posture, Kubernetes, and runtime workloads — all de-duplicated into one inventory with the same prioritization logic.
A single CVE in glibc that shows up on an EC2 host, in a container image, and in a Kubernetes pod running from that image is one record with three locations — not three tickets in three tools.
How It Compares to Tenable, Qualys & Intruder
vs Tenable Vulnerability Management / Nessus
Tenable has the deepest OS and network-scanner coverage in the industry and is the default for large regulated enterprises. It is priced per asset through a sales motion and does not include container, Kubernetes or cloud posture in the base tier. TigerGate matches Tenable's Linux and cloud VM depth, adds eBPF runtime reachability, container and Kubernetes coverage in one price, and is self-serve.
vs Qualys VMDR
Qualys VMDR is a mature agent-based VM platform with strong patching workflows and sprawling module coverage. The agent footprint is heavier than TigerGate's and pricing is enterprise-only. Teams moving to cloud-native stacks often find TigerGate's lighter agent and bundled Kubernetes and runtime coverage closer to how they already work.
vs Intruder
Intruder is self-serve and SMB-friendly for external and basic internal scanning. It is a good fit for a small team with a handful of VMs and no cloud ambition. TigerGate covers the same ground and extends into cloud posture, Kubernetes, container, code and runtime security without changing tools as the team grows.
Server Security FAQ
Scan your first server free
14-day trial. No credit card. Agentless onboarding in minutes; agent is optional.